Cutting Edge Newsletter™ June 2007Business BriefingHannover HighlightsBy Art Raymond, araymond@raymondnet.com ![]() Many exhibitors at the recent Ligna Hannover Fair in Germany reported booming business. Buoyed by a stronger European economy, shipments of woodworking machinery by German machine makers are set to rise by ten percent in 2007. The exhibits of the large high tech machine makers like Homag, Biesse and IMA were jammed with visitors. Many of the small meeting rooms were continually taken by buyers in the midst of negotiating purchases. Lightweight panels were the buzz of the show. European furniture makers are rapidly substituting these materials for solid MDF and particleboard components. New technology in the lay-up and pressing of these honeycomb core panels has eliminated much of the labor in the production process. Machine makers now offer a range of equipment enabling woodworkers to match their investment to volume demand. Hardware producers like Häfele offer special connectors that allow creative assembly of these hollow core panels. Furniture giant Ikea has long incorporated lightweight panels in their product offering to reduce weight, energy input and wood fiber consumption. Europe limits the weight of RTA furniture cartons to 55 pounds per package. About forty to fifty percent of all furniture in Europe is flat packed (ready to assemble). The lightweight panels also allow designers to utilize thicker panels (1-1/2” to 2”) in place of ½” and ¾” solid core components. This construction is nothing new. Architectural door producers have used honeycomb as the core material for interior doors for years. Big questions remain to be answered about this technology:
Swedwood, Ikea’s manufacturing subsidiary, is installing a highly mechanized line for production of lightweight panels. Ikea is known for intelligently integrating their product and process design to achieve low costs. Keep your eyes on this technology. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has enacted tighter restrictions on formaldehyde gas leaching out of composite wood panels. To meet the law’s standards, panel producers must modify their adhesives and binders to eliminate most, if not all, of the formaldehyde contents. Set to take effect on January 1, 2009, the Phase One standards will have little impact on materials cost. However, Phase Two will raise the cost of MDF, particleboard, and plywood – key raw materials for furniture, cabinetry and millwork manufacturers, as well as homebuilders. CARB estimates that Phase 2 will raise the material cost of cabinets, countertops, shelves, and mouldings in a 2,000 sq. ft. home by $400. By January 2011, plywood makers must lower their product’s formaldehyde emissions to no more than 0.08 parts per million. Particleboard must emit no more than 0.18 ppm, while MDF’s limit is 0.21 ppm. Phase 2 pushes these limits to 0.05, 0.09 and 0.11 ppm respectively. Formaldehyde is deemed to increase the risk of cancer. Woodworking companies and industry trade groups contended that CARB’s rules are based on unsubstantiated health consequences and ignored newer scientific data. CARB will require that domestic and foreign users of these panelboards must provide third party certification that their materials meet the emission limits. Industry experts wonder how CARB will monitor record keeping at foreign labs engaged by Chinese and other manufacturers. Another stake in the heart of the U.S. furniture industry will hurt our cabinetmakers and other woodworking sectors that have managed to stave off the import tidal wave. Economic Factoid The U.S. is continuously slammed for its extravagant energy consumption. Yes, the U.S uses more energy per capita than any other country in the world. But what about per unit of gross domestic product, the broad measure of an economy’s size? Oil Consumption per Unit of GDP
Seems the U.S. is not so profligate after all… Sector Report Kitchen Cabinets Cabinet sales continue weak following the end of a ten-year uptrend last November. According to the KCMA’s Trend of Business Survey, April sales fell by 11.2 percent, an improvement over March sales which dropped 17.1 percent versus the same month last year. YTD 2007 sales were down 13.9 percent.
Home Furniture The weakness in furniture retailing reported in April’s Business Briefing continues…
Poor business has even affected importers. Casegoods importer Mirador announced its closing and blamed slow business in the past 6 to 8 months. Mirador imported its products from 11 Far Eastern factories and was noted for its innovative designs. Furniture giant Ikea however continues to swim against the tide as the company opened a 310,000 sq. ft. store in Draper, UT, to serve the Salt Lake City market. The Utah store is its 30th in the U.S. and 255th worldwide. Its new Danville, VA, plant is scheduled to begin production in early 2008. Chinese manufacturer, Coe Ltd., has established a U.S. marketing subsidiary, Amelia Home. Coe has 5,000 employees, 50 factories totaling 3 million square feet, and its own timberlands and saw mills. Well-financed Chinese producers continue to go direct to U.S. retailers in a move to optimize the supply chain. Competition in the U.S. furniture business has never been tougher. As noted below, even upholstery producers, who many believed to be immune from foreign competition, are feeling the pain. More at the company level…
Office Furniture BIFMA, the sector trade association, reported April orders for office furniture up 5 percent. Shipments increased by only 2 percent, down from 8 percent in March. Analysts believe that sector growth is moderating toward a GDP-like 3 to 6 percent growth rate. The association’s economic advisor lowered their growth expectations to 6.8 percent in 2007 and 5.6 percent for 2008. At the company level…
Wood Flooring At the company level…
Public PolicyFair Trade DealBy John Satagaj, email@jsatlaw.com ![]() The Bush Administration and Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY) have struck a deal for imposing new requirements on trade partners as a condition for approval of any new trade agreements. It is possible the deal might serve as the basis for an effort to renew the Trade Promotion Authority law that permits the President to negotiate trade agreements without interference by Congress. Under the law, which expires soon, Congress can only vote to approve or disapprove an agreement. The new majority in Congress has made it clear it would not entertain renewal without some changes regarding labor and environment standards. In the meantime, the Administration will have to go back and renegotiate some of the pending agreements with Peru and Panama. The agreements must include a fully-enforceable commitment that Free Trade Agreements (FTA) countries will adopt, maintain and enforce in their laws and practice the five basic international labor standards, as stated in the 1998 International Labor Organization Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. These principles are: the freedom of association; the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor; the effective abolition of child labor and a prohibition on the worst forms of child labor; and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. There must be a new, fully enforceable, binding commitment prohibiting FTA countries from lowering labor standards. The FTAs must have new limitations on "prosecutorial" and "enforcement" discretion. FTA countries cannot defend the failure to enforce laws related to the five basic standards due to resource limitations or decisions to prioritize other enforcement issues. These labor commitments must be subject to the same dispute settlement mechanisms and penalties as other FTA obligations. According to the United States Trade Representative’s office, violation requires showing that non-enforcement of labor obligations occurred through a sustained or recurring course of action or inaction. A violation must occur in a manner affecting trade or investment between the parties. The agreement does not change the current definition of labor laws in our FTAs and thus applies only to federal labor laws. Only a government can invoke dispute settlement against another government for a labor violation under an FTA. There must be a fully-enforceable commitment that FTA countries adopt, implement, and enforce in their laws and practice obligations under seven common major multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) The MEAs are: the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species; the Montreal Protocol on Ozone Depleting Substances: the Convention on Marine Pollution; the Inter-American Tropical Tuna convention; the Ramsar Convention on the Wetlands; the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling; and the Convention on Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. There must be a new, fully enforceable, binding commitment prohibiting FTA countries from lowering environmental standards. There must be a "conflict of laws" provision where a covered MEA obligation affects an obligation under an FTA. The FTA cannot be used to undermine the MEA obligation. “This is truly a historic breakthrough,” said Chairman Rangel. “For decades now, trade has been a polarizing issue in Congress, but today’s agreement signals a new direction and a renewed spirit of bipartisanship. We hope that we can improve the image of trade by creating new jobs and forging a partnership with the private sector to ensure that at the end of the day we’re advancing a policy that makes trade work, not just for shareholders, but for all Americans.” “This agreement will allow us to move the American trade agenda forward,” Ranking Member Jim McCrery (R-LA) said, “I believe it is a good and fair compromise that takes into account the concerns of all parties. I urge all Members of Congress who care about making sure our nation remains a leader on trade to support this agreement.” These developments are encouraging. The key is whether we are willing to "go to the mat" to enforce these agreements after the fact. This Administration has gotten more aggressive in using the World Trade Organization to hold China’s feet to the fire. The next test comes this summer; the Administration will have to decide whether to allow certain products from India and Brazil to enjoy duty-free status under the General System of Preferences program. Keep an eye on it. The U.S. Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee established June 6th from 9 AM to 2 PM as a Manufacturing Summit. This committee is chaired by Senator Debbie Stabenow from Michigan and was actively supported by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The program was divided into three components: a welcome from Senator Stabenow; an open discussion on American Manufacturing; and a lunch panel on The Future of the Domestic Auto Industry. About 70 people were invited from industry, unions, association, and other vested organizations. Mark Chappell of Alexander Dodds represented the Association; Peter Perez was also invited but could not attend, so Ken Hutton from WMMA Staff took his place and also represented the Association. In addition, there were a number of Senate staffers and print media in attendance. Before the luncheon panel began, the electronic media stormed the room and set up shop with their cameras and interviewers. At our table, there were the following people: This was a theme to which the Senator held during her Welcoming Comments, where she acknowledged that the importance of manufacturing needed national leadership to keep awareness of its leveraging role in the economy and of its vital link in national security. She repeatedly promised that this was not a one-day event, but the beginning of a series of dialogues. She referenced an American Manufacturing Initiative (AMI), which Senator Levin and she crafted as “a proposal from Michigan Democrats to boost the U.S. economy." There are six keynote areas, each with legislative and regulatory initiatives needed: Manufacturing Incentives and Mandates; Trade; Healthcare; Advanced Vehicle Development; Fuel Conservation and Biofuels; and Department of Defense Initiatives. While noting that manufacturing created the Middle Class of this country, the Senator highlighted the bad news of manufacturing job loss. She observed that U.S. manufacturers are competing with countries, not just other companies and, therefore, needed the Federal Government as a partner to address trade imbalances and level the international playing field, resolve the cost escalation for healthcare coverage, and stimulate innovation. Senator Stabenow noted that the choice in a global economy is to the bottom or race to the top; she claims the latter can be achieved by leveling the playing field via education and innovation. Senator Levin echoed many of Stabenow’s themes, while noting that the Democratic Party needed to get the issues facing manufacturing into the Presidential campaign. To that end, AMI is in front of every Democratic candidate. Significantly absent in this Manufacturing Initiative for the 21st Century, as the Senators oftentimes called it, was anything on tort reform and infrastructure, let alone a meaningful, coherent national energy policy (snippets were listed). Levin stated that the Federal Government must “do no harm” in partnering with manufacturing to resolve the issues Senator Stabenow detailed. Senator Carper of Delaware observed that the major role of the Federal Government is to provide a nurturing environment for job creation and job preservation. Others in attendance during the morning session included Senators Richard Durbin of IL, Jack Reed of RI, Bill Nelson of FL, Ken Salazar of CO, Sherrod Brown of OH; Mark Pryor of AK, and Jeff Bingaman of NM. Healthcare was the first topic of the AM session. Charles McClure set the stage in stating that healthcare reform needed four components: 1) Transparency for educated consumers and tracking results; 2) IT needs standards across the board for interconnectivity (there are islands of IT excellence, which is both good and bad news); 3) Wellness initiatives between company and individual create/reward healthier lifestyle; and 4) Waste or duplication. It was noted that Durbin and Lincoln are working with BlueCross and the healthcare industry to provide the Federal healthcare system to private industry. Two union leaders made it very clear that there is no more contentious discussion with industry than healthcare, particularly with corporate bankruptcies and the workers’ loss of their coverage benefits, but the “fix” cannot be achieved at the bargaining table as a national healthcare plan is needed. After speaking with Mark Chappell during the morning reception, Chris Holmes extolled the virtues of small business and reminded others about the difficulties of managing healthcare costs due to company size. The Senators were requested to examine the costs of well-intended legislation and who shoulders those costs. The second subject of the AM session was Trade, which Senator Stabenow characterized as subject to a foreign government subsidiary with unlevel playing fields, IPR theft, and copyright infringement. Mark spoke on the problem of non-tariff barriers in trade with Europe. Dwight Carlson from our table spoke eloquently about the symbolic relationship between technology and innovation but not cheap labor as a means of competitive advantage. Television, lunch, and the intrigue of the auto executives panel brought the Presidential candidates and other notable Senators, including Hillary Clinton of NY, Joe Biden of DE, Evan Bayh of IN, Bernie Sanders of VT, Pat Leahy of VT, Barbara Mikulski of MD, Claire McCaskill of MO, Byron Dorgan of ND, Amy Klobuhar of MN, Jon Tester of MT, Ben Cardin of MD, and Dianne Feinstein of CA.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recognized that manufacturing is crucial to the future of the U.S. He also cited the role of the Federal Government in basic R&D and the need to get back to that role, then turning the results over to the private sector. “Energy” was again mentioned as an issue of paramount importance, usually in terms of oil and not a comprehensive energy plan where oil is but one component. For the first time during the entire session, it was recognized that there is a need for not just free trade but fair trade, including enforcement of rules and regulations already on the books—congratulations Senator Reid! He concluded his remarks by expressing a wish to partner with manufacturing on the issues discussed today, for far too long manufacturing was out there on its own. In conclusion, this was an interesting day that only gains significance if there are more sessions like this one and the Senators take heed from the information expressed and develop an action plan.
International Business DevelopmentWMMA Members Exhibiting + Ligna Return Happy & WMMA Host Stand on Exhibit Floor
Thirty-six WMMA members exhibited at Ligna (May 14-18 in Hanover, Germany), the world’s largest woodworking equipment trade fair. Although member participation was down from the 2005 high of 44, all that were interviewed felt their participation was well worth the effort. Some were elated with the results and look to overseas markets as a projected bright spot for 2008 and perhaps longer. Ligna continues to draw visitors from outside Europe. This year’s event drew over 50,000 from outside Germany, or about 47% of the 107,000 total. Some were exceptionally pleased with leads from East Europe, as well as Australia and New Zealand and parts of South America and Canada. One disappointment was the number of Russian visitors. A major Russian furniture fair was held in Moscow the same week as Ligna and many prominent Russian furniture producers and suppliers were absent because of it. Members credited both the continued fall in the dollar and their repeated participation in Ligna for their good results. Other Ligna 2007 statistics are:
Dealers and buyers from around the world meet every other year at Ligna to see what’s new, what’s changing within the industry to maintain old contacts and make new ones. For these reasons, Ligna is critically important to WMMA members interested in maintaining or expanding their international markets --- whether by exporting, importing or a combination of both. It is also a unique opportunity to assess new technologies, identify market niches and anticipate competition. It bears repeating that any member interested in international trade must be at Ligna. The next Ligna will be held May 18-22, 2009 and the WMMA will have another stand on the floor for members use. The WMMA Booth The WMMA organized a 300 sq. ft. corner stand in Hall 12 (solid wood processing hall). There was adequate space for members’ brochures, samples and back wall space for company logo or product photos. A 50” plasma flat screen monitor was mounted behind the bar area about 2.5 meters from the ground. It could be easily seen from across the hall. The booth also had tables, seating and a bar for visitors. All members were invited to share the booth for a WMMA fee of $200, plus a Deutsche Messe “co-exhibitor fee” and “media charge” of $720 (euros 529). The booth provided first timers with an opportunity to experience Ligna while gaining exposure. For those that had exhibited previously, it provided an opportunity to be more flexible and make appointments to meet with existing and new clients. Still others, which had attended Ligna in years past, found the booth an excellent “home away from home” where they could display their literature, meet with clients and easily visit exhibits. Eight WMMA members took advantage of the booth sharing option and displayed literature; six sent company executives who worked out of the booth. The WMMA hired three translators to assist members with foreign language guests and provide refreshments. Between the three, they were either fluent or conversant in English, German, Spanish and Russian. Most traveling executives spent much of the time outside the booth meeting with potential and existing clients. Like member exhibitors the results were mixed with most stating they were pleased with their results. The WMMA will take out space on the exhibit floor in 2009 and most likely in Hall 12. Business DevelopmentSales Forecasting ToolsJune 2007 Leading Indicator Association NewsBecome a Cutting Edge Contributor - Submit Your WMMA Success StoryWhat WMMA membership benefits are you taking advantage of? Use this form to capture how WMMA has helped you. Now is your chance to help improve the safety standards for woodworking machinery. If you use, design, manufacture, sell, distribute, install, repair, or rebuild any of these machines, you should be interested in their safety. The ANSI Sub-Committees draft the standards and you can participate. Most work is done electronically and by telephone – little or no travel required. The goal of the Sub-Committees is to draft meaningful and comprehensive standards for the safety of specific machines. Your participation on a committee will affect all aspects, from design to use and training, of future products in the woodworking industry. To volunteer for a sub-committee, contact any of the following Chairmen: ASC O1.1-C2 - Gang Rip Saws ASC O1.1-C3 - CNC Machining Center ASC O1.1-C4 – Shapers ASC O1.1-C5 - Straight Line Rip Saws ASC O1.1-C6 – Edgebander For further information, contact the ASC O1.1
Mark Your Calendar Today! The Woodworking Industry Conference (WIC 2008) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ©2007 by Wood Machinery Manufacturers of America, Philadelphia, PA. All rights reserved. This publication or any parts of it may not be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. For permission to reprint articles or to send correspondence, write to: WMMA, 100 North 20th Street, 4th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103-1443 Phone: (215) 564-3484 Fax: (215) 963-9785 E-mail: wmma@fernley.com The opinion expressed in any articles by outside consultants are their own views and not necessarily those of the WMMA. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||